‘School Choice’ bill offers no choice to taxpayers

By Jodi Enos-Berlage, Ridgeway

Dear Editor,
Ninety-two percent of Iowa’s children are educated in public schools*. As a parent, taxpayer and college educator that receives this product, I care as much about the success of a child in Cedar Rapids or Western Iowa as I do about a child in Decorah. 
With nothing less than deep sadness, I share that a bill representing a profound shift in how Iowa’s children are educated and how Iowan’s tax dollars are spent was passed in the Senate – only one week after it was released and with overwhelming negative comments from the public. Local Senator Mike Klimesh voted for this bill; Senator Waylon Brown was absent.
This bill, SF159, enables parents of eligible students to use $5,270 of state taxpayer dollars to pay nonpublic school tuition. The local public school loses these dollars. There are three major problems:
1. This bill forces Iowa taxpayers to support education that is not available, inclusive or equitable to all Iowa students. Nonpublic schools are not required to accept every student regardless of race, religion, gender, sexual orientation, intellectual ability, athletic ability or disability, nor accommodate and provide for all abilities and needs. Their school boards are not publicly elected and financial transparency to taxpayers is not required. Significantly, Senator Klimesh voted down three amendments to SF159 that would have required these elements from nonpublic schools that receive taxpayer dollars.
2. As 98% of nonpublic school children in Iowa attend schools are religiously affiliated*, this bill forces Iowa taxpayers to support religious education, which typically includes religion classes, weekly masses/services and religion-specific doctrine. All three of my children received a wonderful education from an exceptional staff at St. Benedict School in Decorah, but I don’t think other Iowan’s tax dollars should pay for this education, whether it be Catholic, Lutheran, Muslim, Jewish or Wiccan. 
The distinction between taxpayer support of the school and the church is also dangerously grey, e.g., St. Benedict Church pays for nearly half of students’ tuition through a parish subsidy, a practice that is not uncommon. There is thus strong potential that taxpayer-supported tuition would provide direct relief to parish budgets. 
Importantly, a highly successful option that gives taxpayers a choice to support religious education already exists, the Iowa School Tuition Organization; it offers a beautiful compromise that fosters collaboration, rather than competition between public and private schools.
3. The bill will not fix the problem it aims to solve. A student eligible for this state voucher must reside in one of 34 schools identified by a federal program as in need of comprehensive support and improvement. Rather than investing attention and human and financial resources to improve these schools, this bill would defund them, and force competition for $5,270 with a nonpublic school that gets to operate by an entirely different set of rules. By what logic or evidence will this strategy help the public school in need of improvement? And how long do legislators think it will take before financially-strapped families, religious schools, and parishes in non-struggling districts, including Winneshiek County, ask for the same support that those in Dubuque would have, for example? (Two of the 34 schools are in Dubuque)** 
I urge you to hold Senator Klimesh (mike.klimesh@legis.iowa.gov) accountable for his votes last week, and to contact your state representative (michael.bergan@legis.iowa.gov; Jane.Bloomingdale@legis.iowa.gov) and ask them to vote no on SF159.
*educateiowa.gov
**Des Moines Register, Dec 18, 2018

Jodi Enos-Berlage
Ridgeway

 

Submit A Comment

Fill out the form to submit a comment. All comments require approval by our staff before it is displayed on the website.

Subscribe
Notify of
0 Comment
Oldest
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments